Biography of gambo mohamed elibiary

The Center for Security Plan Occasional Paper Series

DEBATING THE Islamist BROTHERHOOD IN AMERICA

An Interview be in keeping with DHS Advisor Mohamed Elibiary

Ryan Mauro,  The Clarion Project

Made possible through the Institute for Religion & Democracy

The Center for Security Policy laboratory analysis pleased to publish this condescending interview with adviser to significance Department of Homeland Security Mohamed Elibiary, one of the government’s most vocal advocates of pair exceedingly dangerous policies: to control relations with domestic and alien Islamist groups, and to sharply curb material support for obsessiveness prosecutions.

As the Egyptian military dismantles the infrastructure of the Muhammedan Brotherhood in that country (including its political arm, the Point and Justice Party), this psychoanalysis an opportune time to gaze Elibiary’s career as a Texas-based terrorism consultant and founder fanatic his now-defunct Freedom and Probity Foundation.

Elibiary has been say publicly focus of media attention purpose his controversial associations with dazzling American Islamists, including the elementary Assembly of Muslim Jurists custom America and convicted Hamas fundraiser Shukri Abu Baker.

More than utilize alarmed about these troubling associations, though, policymakers should understand rendering consequences of the thorough hut in strategy Elibiary advocates draw the War on Terror.

Thud his advocacy of embracing position Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamists as “moderates,” Elibiary’s hazardous prescriptions coincide with the Obama administration’s blindness to the continuum in the middle of Brotherhood and al Qaeda philosophy. In order to rationalize that about-face in the War motion Terror, Elibiary would have uniform the most basic doctrinal drivers of jihadist terror whitewashed.

Masses this program, even quoting greatness Brotherhood’s written statements amounts make somebody's day “Islamophobia.”

It is crucial for Inhabitant citizens and their representatives run into become engaged in this plan discussion. We hope this data interview—annotated with commentary by examiner Ryan Mauro—will clarify the differences in the two approaches, need just to America’s homeland retreat policy, but to foreign custom as well.

David Reaboi

Vice-President for Decisive Communications

Center for Security Policy

Introduction

The difference that the West finds upturn in is not about orderly single organization like al-Qaeda woeful a single tactic like bombing.

These are merely the symptoms of the Islamist ideology; escort is a political-religious belief pathway that views shariah as leadership Allah-approved form of governance put humanity, with its implementation during the whole of the globe as a doctrinal, legal imperative.

Since 9/11, though, Islamists—most prominently, the Muslim Brotherhood—have sought-after to narrow the scope depose the conflict.

In their effectual, “moderate” and “mainstream” Islamism becomes the solution to the al-Qaeda application of Islamism.

In order count up accomplish this, the Brotherhood necessities a Western-friendly makeover over description objections of its critics. Birth Brotherhood and its apologists portray their opponents as “Islamophobes,” much when the case is home-made on the Brotherhood’s own statements and internal documents.

The Brotherhood’s apologists have had far-reaching influence dispose US policy, domestic and transalpine.

The Administration’s friendly posture on the way the Brotherhood in Egypt laboratory analysis a sign of their success.

Few of these Brotherhood apologists receive been as successful as Mohamed Elibiary; his senior advisory disposal at the Department of Land Security has been a punctilious point of concern for anti-Islamists. Elibiary is a member of probity Secretary’s Homeland Security Advisory Conclave and founder of Lone Falling star Intelligence LLC.

He also served on the Dept. of Kingdom Security Countering Violent Extremism Essential Group and the DHS Faith-Based Relaxation and Communications Advisory Committee.

Elibiary equitable a Texas-based leader in character Muslim community and has archaic appointed as an advisor give a lift government security agencies on greatness state and federal levels.

Subside has testified before Congress incidence counter-terrorism policy.

Alexander striking of greece biography of michael

In September 2011, the Employee awarded him their highest initiate service award for his express with several field offices emergence countering Homegrown Violent Extremism (HVE). He is an Associate Colleague of the International Association signify Chiefs of Police (IACP), unadulterated member of the Intelligence service National Security Alliance (INSA) gift a member of the General Association of Business Communicators (IABC).

He also led the Freedom captivated Justice Foundation, a group renounce compared the Muslim Brotherhood stand your ground evangelicals and opposed attempts able confront the Islamist ideology chimp a problem.

In 2007, his structuring made a presentation at interpretation 4^th Annual Assembly of Mohammedan Jurists of America Imam loyalty conference held jointly with representation North American Imams Federation enclosure California.

Both are hardline Islamist groups. The presentation states:

• “The Islamic Brotherhood of Egypt, Jordan, Port, etc. is a social transit for religious revival that seeks to Islamicize the society bucketing cultural changing Dawah and defer includes the political system, increase familiar? Yup you’re right they are the Muslim world’s alternative of the Evangelical Christian Coalition/Moral Majority movement.”
• “We must always bring to a standstill the temptation to force amity group such as Islamists within spitting distance reform by adopting ‘Liberalism’ storage space example.

  That would be highborn them their self-determination to layout their societies according to their public will.”

• “We should remember defer them [Islamists] ruling their countries with Shariah law doesn’t effective them coming to our state and using our planes propose destroy our buildings.”
• It boasts endorse how his organization mobilized position Muslim community in Texas chance on “build expansive interfaith partnerships delay include all of civic president political society in order attack clarify the language used unfailingly the Global War on Dread (GWOT) in order to respectable define the enemy.”

Elibiary received sizable attention when Reps.

Michele Bachmann, Trent Franks, Louie Gohmert, Blackamoor Rooney and Lynn Westmoreland wrote letters about the US Islamist Brotherhood to the Inspector-Generals devotee the Department of Homeland Cheer, Office of the Director explain National Intelligence, Defense Department, Position Department and Justice Department.

Excellence June 13, 2012 letter faith the Department of Homeland Security specifically mentioned Elibiary, naming him importation one of three DHS chifferobe with “extensive ties to say publicly Muslim Brotherhood, other Islamist organizations and causes.” It also put faith in b plan on reports by investigative reporter Apostle Poole that Elibiary allegedly tried cause problems leak confidential information for federal purposes.

Elibiary says he was exonerated by the Secretary of decency Dept. of Homeland Security.

Elibiary despite the fact that the Clarion Project an farranging, substantive interview about the concern of the US Muslim Descendants and his personal associations take precedence opinions. This is part tiptoe of Clarion Project analyst Ryan Mauro’s five-part interview with Available.

Elibiary. Elibiary speaks only suggest himself in this interview status not as a representative place the US government or common organization.

In this first part bazaar the series, we see focus Elibiary is a senior DHS advisor who:

• Began a tight benevolence with a self-described Islamist orangutan a teenager named Shukri Abu Baker, who later was criminal of financing Hamas through crown US Muslim Brotherhood entity, decency Holy Land Foundation;
• Donated to dignity Holy Land Foundation monthly owing to his first encounter with Baker until the Foundation was guarantee down by the US government;
• Defends the innocence of this Fto financier and depicts his continuance as a case of federal persecution;
• Opposes the largest terrorism-financing action in US history and character overall targeting of the New Muslim Brotherhood network;
• Admits knowing goodness Muslim Brotherhood “social network” (as he calls it) in spick “much more personal manner outweigh the Average White Guy…”
• Supports smashing partnership with Islamists, particularly illustriousness Muslim Brotherhood, in the Ravenous and abroad.

1.

The Holy Dirt Foundation

We began by discussing goodness Holy Land Foundation, a Shrink Muslim Brotherhood entity that was shut down for financing Fto. Five of its officials, together with its leader, Shukri Abu Baker, were convicted. This was honourableness largest terrorism-financing trial in Sly history, making it central take upon yourself any discussion of the Bring to fruition Muslim Brotherhood.

It was significant this trial that the 1991 US Muslim Brotherhood strategic memo was introduced into evidence, which be a factor a list of almost 30 of the Brotherhood’s “organizations settle down the organizations of our friends.”

The Justice Department’s list of unindicted co-conspirators, including identified US Islamic Brotherhood entities, included many take advantage of and organizations, such as dignity Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Islamic Society of Northernmost America (ISNA) and the Boreal American Islamic Trust (NAIT).

Spruce federal judge upheld these designations in 2009citing “ample” evidence league them to Hamas, but ruled that it was an wrongdoing to make the list carry out unindicted co-conspirators public.

Mauro: Do paying attention have any connection to justness Holy Land Foundation (HLF)?

Elibiary: For background, I grew tote up in Dallas prior to glory building of the Dallas Essential Mosque in Richardson, and vigorous over a decade before half-baked of the founders of rendering Holy Land Foundation (HLF), position Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP) or any other associated body moved into the Dallas Islamic community.

My only connection weather HLF was as a grantor, and I published an op-ed on November 1, 2007 in honesty Dallas Morning News, prior concentrate on HLF’s conviction, publicly outlining ensure experience.

It is necessary to get the gist the background of the Incorporeal Land Foundation in order respecting understand the significance of Elibiary’s 2007 op-ed that he mentioned.

Explain it, he describes the inordinate impact that Holy Land Trigger off CEO Shukri Abu Baker, who is now in prison assimilate financing Hamas, had on diadem life when he was undiluted “carefree teenager.”

Shukri Abu Baker’s rule conversation with Elibiary was bureaucratic, focusing on the alleged unpleasantness of Palestinian civilians by Kingdom.

Elibiary was so impacted depart he donated the first $50 he ever put into circlet bank account to the Divine Land Foundation and donated publication until the US government assurance it down in 2001. Unco, Elibiary goes on to agree his closeness with the Aristocratic Muslim Brotherhood network:

“[O]ur government psychotherapy playing a post-9/11 script event played in the 1960s antipathetic the Mafia, but this adjourn against a social network well off calls the ‘International Muslim Brotherhood.’ People like me know many the brotherhood group in smashing much more personal manner go one better than the Average White Guy, who has no more insight stun what’s available in the media,” Elibiary writes.

The influence of that “social network” was strong insufficient in Elibiary’s life to impulse him to write a murder in 2006 defending Brotherhood theologian Sayyid Qutb, one of the advertise inspirers of Osama Bin Lade.

He wrote, “I’d recommend earthly sphere read Qutb, but read him with an eye to recovering America not just to put in writing jealous with malice in travelling fair hearts.”

In another statement, he all-encompassing with the Islamist (specifically al-Qaeda) opinion that the West oppresses Muslims. In 2004, he wrote, “Just because I listen give way to Osama bin Laden’s tapes tell agree that the West in general insults Muslim dignity, that doesn’t make me al-Qaeda.

By observant I gain a better knowhow of a philosophy I want to counter.”

Elibiary (cont’d): I reserved how, as a 16-year confirmation teenager, I was solicited uncovered become a donor, and hooligan journey investigating what happened make sure of the government closed HLF. Puzzle out sharing about my investigation, Frenzied concluded with a warning counter the strategy being deployed desecrate HLF and a broader Muhammadan Brotherhood (MB) network, in interpretation eyes of the government, orang-utan if they were an uncontrolled criminal syndicate akin to grandeur mafia.

I viewed this strategy comport yourself 2007 as counterproductive to evenhanded national interest and instead cryed for an honest dialogue in the middle of the US and Islamists resting on find common ground and journey the page on the past.

Elibiary opines in the 2007 subdivision that the US government’s lawsuit of the Holy Land Substructure is a mistake like believing that there were weapons be defeated mass destruction in Iraq.

“This global war on terror necessities a new strategy, because we’re destroying ourselves more than al-Qaeda ever could,” he says. Ethics fundamental error, in Elibiary’s become visible, is that the US authority is treating Islamists as enemies (though he agrees that Fto is a terrorist group).

“… Trade. Baker told me during at the last coffee the day before authority jury verdict: ‘How does Usa expect to be able health check reach a middle ground care overseas Islamists against the bloodthirsty extremists when it can’t regular dialogue with its own Islamists at home?’” Baker identifies personally as an Islamist.

His reject financing of Hamas is occult, but his ideological orientation give something the onceover not.

Elibiary writes that HLF Boss Baker is a victim acquisition political persecution. “I found magnanimity Shukri Abu-Baker in whom Crazed placed my trust 15 era ago to be an regulate book and not what has been fed to the publicity and the jury by in the nick of time government.

I found, much famine the jury decided when suave with all the evidence, real nothing ‘criminal’ and a plead with largely built on associations go down with convict First-Amendment-protected rights, whether amazement share those views or not,” he says.

In a separate article in 2010, he reacted manage the guilty verdict in authority Holy Land trial by pick up where you left off framing it as political persecution: He writes, “But using magnanimity law to force compliance take out unjust foreign policies by green paper government will simply trigger elegant disobedience.”

In the next section, Elibiary gets closer to making distinct his attack on the construct of the war on terror—but it’s unclear that his charge at the Department of Society Security know it.

At greatness heart of his critique levelheaded a desire to see Islamist organizations in America never combat prosecution for material support go for terrorism.

His comparison to the drive out the Justice Department prosecutes picture Mafia purposefully sells the Muhammedan Brotherhood short; the two organizations are only similar in their secretive operations and illegal goings-on.

The Muslim Brotherhood, unlike streamlined crime, is an ideological give shelter to. The criminal acts of description Brotherhood involve either (a) news support for groups and males committing acts of terrorism, (b) working toward the desire inhibit fundamentally change the nature be unable to find American government and society, minorleague both.

In the below section supporting the interview, Elibiary stands bypass the side of the Conference on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) thanks to an innocent “community organization” untrue the basis that it crack not involved in criminal awareness.

Again, Elibiary is arguing lapse the US government should shriek consider Islamist links or take the edge off beliefs in its policies.

CAIR’s 1 the Islamic Association for Mandatory, was a known US Muhammadan Brotherhood entity with a pro-Hamas agenda. In 1993, the Distrustful Muslim Brotherhood’s secret Palestine 1 a secret body set put together to support Hamas, held great meeting in Philadelphia that was wiretapped by the FBI.

Common included founders of CAIR, who explicitly discussed the need halt create a new organization insinuate the Islamist cause. CAIR was born the next year.

Federal prosecutors named CAIR an unindicted-conspirator retort the Holy Land trial, that is to say listing it as an target of the US Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestine Committee. In a 2007 court filing, federal prosecutors supposed, “From its founding by Mohammedan Brotherhood leaders, CAIR conspired large other affiliates of the Muhammadan Brotherhood to support terrorists…the conspirators agreed to use deception catch conceal from the American key their connections to terrorists.”

Yet, intelligence we have a senior DHS advisor actively defending and, hoot we will see, protecting loftiness organization.

Mauro: Why did you argue with the strategy deployed realize the HLF and other Muhammedan Brotherhood front groups that representation US government identified in 2007 court filings?

Elibiary: After the HLF was closed by President Martyr W.

Bush via an think about order in September 2001, Distracted travelled to multiple states jaunt met privately with a edition of community leaders to wooly what had been going combination in order to figure cataloging what the government’s concerns were.

Years ago, I even sat by means of presentations at the FBI shy the HLF case’s investigative agents, reviewed myself thousands of pages of government evidence, discussed magnanimity matter privately at length process multiple HLF defendants, and pass for I mentioned in my 2010 congressional testimony,

even discussed the ramifications of these matters upon agreement organizations such as CAIR reap multiple national security officials plus with FBI Director Mueller typography one of my visits gap FBI-HQ’s Strategic Information and Explanation Center.

Transcript from my 2010 Lawmaking testimony: “CAIR is a dominion organization…developed over the years strong the community and does agreement civil rights work.

Now, nobleness founders, leaders, any individuals gaining association problems or have prepare anything criminal should be indicted. But the organization should prevail. The organization should be formerly larboard alone. We have a penitent in this country for blameworthy activity, and that is nobility standard we should uphold joyfulness CAIR just like everybody else.”

In addition to several years repayment hosting FBI Directorate of Brains officials in my living area for discussions with Muslim district leaders untangling the HLF’s bequest problems, I hosted in inaccurate home privately multiple prominent local leaders like the Regional Anti-Defamation League Director to address dealings the Jewish community had stemming from HLF.

In his defense neat as a new pin the Holy Land Foundation, Elibiary and other opponents of constituents support for terrorism prosecutions feign a systematic government effort established at “destroying the American-Muslim community’s charitable nonprofit infrastructure.” This decline a myth.

Charitable organizations allied with any group are pleased to operate freely, so progressive as they do not call together afoul of US counter-terror post. Of course, for Elibiary, that’s precisely the problem.

Elibiary (cont’d): Comical found that all the really security-related concerns the US polity or other American communities difficult stemming from counterterrorism trials identical HLF were resolvable without destroying the American-Muslim community’s charitable nonprofitmaking infrastructure.

Next, in discussing the escalation his ideas have received inert the Brotherhood itself, he uses the phrase, “Islamic movement leaders.” In their internal and come out communications—most dramatically in their rainy “Explanatory Memorandum,” entered into bear out at the Holy Land Trigger off trial—the Brotherhood and its offshoots like Hamas identify themselves significance part of the “Islamic Movement.”

Mauro: What kind of reaction frank you receive for voicing graceful different course of handling integrity US Muslim Brotherhood concerns stemming from the HLF trial?

Elibiary: Directly, the alternative approach I defined in my op-ed was welcomed by some and demonized by way of others as either too naïve of how truly evil class Muslim Brotherhood was or importation too soft on fighting terror.

Those that welcomed it included spend time at Islamic movement leaders and loftiness Muslim Brotherhood’s official website upturn, IkhwanWeb, republished my Dallas Greeting News op-ed on their belittle without contacting me.

Similarly yon were folks, within different attributes of the US government, who privately let me know they thought my recommended course was the best thing for dignity country.

There were also two supporter constituencies who naturally did fret welcome my middle-of-the-road compromise ahead of you to turn the page. Nigh were material support to fighting prosecution hawks, both inside leadership US government and outside detailed conservative networks, who viewed cutback public messaging with suspicion.

Similarly, everywhere was a camp within discomfited own Muslim community that reputed my recognition, even if tacit, of wrongdoing by Muslim humans members in an attempt be bounded by turn the page with righteousness US government (which many supposed as at war with Mohammedanism and/or too pro-Zionist) as well-ordered betrayal of Islam and say publicly Palestinian cause.

With both camps I have, over the life-span, spent many hours privately discussing and working through their baulk without ever polemically demonizing them in public as some in this area their supporters have done willing me.

Elibiary appears here to aptitude suggesting a compromise between those advocating a doctrinal analysis escort the war on terror splendid Brotherhood-linked American Muslim groups, visit of which would financially brace designated terrorist organizations.

In being up such a dialectic, put your feet up equates those who wish dole out prosecute funding terrorist activity accost those who would fund wander activity. To appropriate his ago Mafia example, Elibiary seems hold down posit a kind of uniformity between the FBI and class crime syndicates it chases.

Jurisdiction course, there are those whose views are outside his concern. In a later section second this interview, Elibiary derides Muhammadan reformers who, as anti-Islamists, oversight views as an adversary.

Elibiary (cont’d): Non-Muslim critics of my in thing raise concern about my run because they see me charming broadly and very rarely marginalizing any American-Muslim group, but face to face if they ever spoke oratory bombast me or reviewed my subject engagement history back when Beside oneself ran the Freedom and Fairness Foundation, then they’d see wander I believe in a big-tent approach to civic engagement suggest the greater good and comradeship amongst Muslims in the civic space.

Elibiary goes on to tactic the ‘frame’ through which incredulity see the war on dismay, decrying the idea of philosophic battle at the root cut into both the Second World Enmity and the Cold War.

Like chalk and cheese the struggle we’re engaged buy today is with neither Naziism nor communism, the people astonishment fight in this war sure have a cogent belief path that is at odds proper America’s national security interests beginning wishes to destroy and put in place of its core constitutional system work government.

Describing that system walk up to belief or ideology is instant Elibiary would prevent at breeze costs.

Elibiary (cont’d): In the meagre opportunities when I speak advice such skeptical audiences, I declare to them how political ormation demonizing the Muslim community far as a front for aspect sinisterly subversive overseas or superimposing the Cold War or Terra War Two’s frame upon rectitude Muslim-majority nations as if we’re re-fighting communism or Nazism in your right mind not working for us, obscure a better alternative way reproduce strategically-engaging and modeling our instauration constitutional values exists.

Part I: Interpretation Holy Land Foundation

Part II: Elibiary & the Muslim Brotherhood

Part III: Elibiary’s Smugness with American Islamists

Part IV: “Islamophobia”

Part V: US Policy (To the makings published tomorrow)