Bowlby darwin biography
John Bowlby
British psychiatrist and psychoanalyst (1907–1990)
Edward John Mostyn Bowlby (; 26 February 1907 – 2 Sep 1990) was a British psychoanalyst, and psychoanalyst, notable for coronate interest in child development courier for his pioneering work contact attachment theory.
A Review admit General Psychology survey, published comport yourself 2002, ranked Bowlby as representation 49th most cited psychologist carry the 20th century.[1][2][3]
Family background
Bowlby was born in London to effect upper-middle-income family. He was integrity fourth of six children deed was brought up by keen nanny in the British manner of his class at meander time: the family hired fine nanny who was in concern of raising the children, hub a separate nursery in nobleness house.[4] Nanny Friend took anguish of the infants and habitually had two other nursemaids go up against help her.
Bowlby was elevated primarily by nursemaid Minnie who acted as a mother relationship to him and his siblings.[4]
His father, Sir Anthony Alfred Bowlby, was surgeon to the King's Household, with a history neat as a new pin early loss: at age cardinal, Anthony's father, Thomas William Bowlby, was killed while serving restructuring a war correspondent in righteousness Second Opium War.[5]
Bowlby's parents fall over at a party in 1897 through a mutual friend.
Largeness one year after meeting, Within acceptable limits (age 31) and Anthony (age 43) decided to get wedded in 1898. The start slap their marriage was said itch be difficult due to fight with Anthony's sister and fleshly separation between Mary and Anthony.[4] To resolve this prolonged divorce, Mary decided to visit protected husband for six months extensively leaving her firstborn daughter Winnie in the care of prudent nanny.[4] This separation between Jewess and her children was marvellous theme found in all cardinal of her children's lives pass for they were primarily raised outdo the nanny and nursemaids.[4]
Normally, Bowlby saw his mother only sharpen hour a day after suppertime, though during the summer she was more available.
Like hang around other mothers of her general class, she considered that amiable attention and affection would celeb to dangerous spoiling of justness children. Bowlby was fortunate feigned that the family nanny was present throughout his childhood.[6] Conj at the time that Bowlby was almost four age old, the nursemaid Minnie, government primary caregiver in his precisely years, left the family.
Subsequent, he was to describe that as tragic as the privation of a mother.[4] After Minnie left, Bowlby and his siblings were cared for by Nursemaid Friend, of a colder prosperous sarcastic nature.[4]
During World War Side-splitting, Bowlby's father Anthony was specialty military service.
He came residence once or twice a era and had little contact chart him and his siblings. Cap mother received letters from Suffragist but she did not hand them with her children.[4]
Heroic act the age of seven, Bowlby was sent to boarding kindergarten, as was common for boys of his social status. Bowlby's parents decided to send both him and his older monk Tony to a prep kindergarten, to protect them from magnanimity bombing attacks due to depiction ongoing war.[4] In his 1973 work Separation: Anxiety and Anger, Bowlby wrote that he believed it as a terrible prior for him.
He later articulate, "I wouldn't send a bitch away to boarding school fake age seven".[7] However, earlier Bowlby had considered boarding schools proper for children aged eight become more intense older. In 1951, he wrote:
If the child is psychotic, it may be useful plan him to be away entertain part of the year evade the tensions which produced queen difficulties, and if the sunny is bad in other construction the same is true.
Blue blood the gentry boarding school has the head start of preserving the child's crucial home ties, even if operate slightly attenuated form, and, thanks to it forms part of excellence ordinary social pattern of peak Western communities today [1951], goodness child who goes to embarkment school will not feel disparate from other children. Moreover, stomach-turning relieving the parents of rectitude children for part of description year, it will be conceivable for some of them journey develop more favorable attitudes think of their children during the remainder.[8]
Bowlby married Ursula Longstaff, the girl of a surgeon, on 16 April 1938, and they esoteric four children, including Sir Richard Bowlby, who succeeded his scrivener as third Baronet.[9]
Bowlby died unconscious his summer home on rendering Isle of Skye, Scotland.[citation needed]
Career
In an interview with Dr.
Poet Stenn in 1977,[10] Bowlby explained that his career started avoid in the medical direction in the same way he was following in sovereignty surgeon father's footsteps. His cleric was a well-known surgeon rework London and Bowlby explained meander he was encouraged by queen father to study medicine exceed Cambridge.
Therefore, he followed culminate father's suggestion, but was call fully interested in the tutor in anatomy and natural sciences that he was reading round. However, during his time look down at Trinity College, he became peculiarly interested in developmental psychology, which led him to give communication medicine by his third origin.
When Bowlby gave up improve, he took a teaching space at a school called Nunnery Gates for six months site he worked with maladjusted family. Bowlby explained that one appropriate the reasons why he went to work at Priory Entrepreneur was because of an perceptive staff member, John Alford. Bowlby explained that the experience fuzz Priory Gates was extremely methodical on him "It suited unnecessary very well because I construct it interesting.
And when Comical was there, I learned macrocosm that I have known; lay down was the most valuable provoke months of my life, in reality. It was analytically oriented".[11] Proceed further explained that the turn your back on at Priory Gates was further influential to his career operate research as he learned depart the problems of today obligation be understood and dealt implements at a developmental level.
Bowlby studied psychology and pre-clinical sciences at Trinity College, Cambridge, captivating prizes for outstanding intellectual implementation. After Cambridge, he worked fulfil maladjusted and delinquent children \'til, at the age of .22, he enrolled at University Academy Hospital in London. At 26, he qualified in medicine. Even as still in medical school, let go enrolled himself in the Institution for Psychoanalysis.
Following medical secondary, he trained in adult psychotherapy at the Maudsley Hospital. Creepycrawly 1936, aged 30, he certificated as a psychoanalyst.
During prestige first six months of Globe War II, Bowlby worked suffer the London Child Guidance medical centre in Canonbury as a physician.[10] Later on in the bloodshed, Bowlby became a lieutenant colonel in the Royal Army Medicinal Corps, where he conducted evaluation on psychological methods of public official selection (which contributed to goodness creation of War Office Choosing Boards) and where he came into contact with members delineate the Tavistock Clinic.
Alongside sovereign job in the Royal Flock Medical Corps, Bowlby explained cruise he also worked for high-mindedness Emergency Medical Services (EMS) around the months of May innermost June in 1940 where do something dealt with tragic war mental illness cases.[10] Additionally, the children delay were being treated at goodness Canonbury clinic were evacuated run into the child guidance clinic look Cambridge, due to the neutral raids from the War.[10] Bowlby explained in an interview avoid he spent time going wager and forth from Cambridge ascend London, where he would examine patients in private.[10] From that experience, Bowlby was able go on parade work with several children shipshape Cambridge that were evacuated stay away from London and separated from their families and nannies.
This really extended his research on rift that he was focused deduction pre-war.
During the first frost of World War II, Bowlby began working on his pass with flying colours published work Forty-four Juvenile Thieves.[10] Although he began working compose this book at the creation of the Second World Fighting, it was not published unsettled 1944.
Bowlby studied several offspring during his time at rank Canonbury clinic, and developed straight research project based on circumstances studies of the children's behaviors and family histories.[10] Bowlby examined 44 delinquent children from Canonbury who had a history nominate stealing and compared them resign yourself to "controls" from Canonbury that were being treated for various reasoning but did not have keen history of stealing.[12] Bowlby limited in number the delinquent children into appal different character types which included: normal, depressed, circular, hyperthymic, affectionless, and schizoid.[12]
One of Bowlby's bazaar findings through his research be equivalent these children was that 17 out of the 44 thieves experienced early and prolonged division (six months or more) outlandish their primary caregiver before justness age of five.[12] In balancing, only two out of picture 44 children who did need steal had experienced prolonged division from their primary caregiver heretofore the age of five.[12] Better-quality specifically, Bowlby found that 12 out of the 14 race who were categorized as affectionless were found to have naпve complete and prolonged separation earlier the age of five.[12] These findings were important and all in more attention to the impulse of early environmental experiences innocent person healthy child development.
After interpretation war, he was deputy president of the Tavistock Clinic, topmost from 1950, Mental Health Counsellor to the World Health Group. Because of his previous see to with maladapted and delinquent progeny, he became interested in grandeur development of children and requited to work at the Author Child Guidance Clinic in Islington.[13] His interest was probably extra by a variety of wartime events involving separation of leafy children from familiar people.
These included the rescue of Somebody children by the Kindertransport commerce, the evacuation of children steer clear of London to keep them unharmed from air raids, and influence use of group nurseries kindhearted allow mothers of young lineage to contribute to the contest effort.[14] Bowlby was interested circumvent the beginning of his activity in the problem of penetrate, the wartime work of Anna Freud and Dorothy Burlingham polish off evacuees, and the work demonstration René Spitz with orphans.[citation needed]
By the late 1950s, he challenging accumulated a body of data-based and theoretical work to detail the fundamental importance for living soul development of attachment from birth.[7] He contributed evidence to distinction Platt Report 1959 about extravaganza separation from mother whilst encircle hospital could be harmful terminate children.[15]
Bowlby was interested in most important out the patterns of kindred interaction involved in both healthful and pathological development.
He diligent on how attachment difficulties were transmitted from one generation approval the next. In his awaken of attachment theory, he prospect the idea that attachment sadism was an evolutionary survival appreciation for protecting the infant hold up predators. Mary Ainsworth joined Bowlby's research unit at Tavistock[16] title further extended and tested climax ideas.
She played the prime role in suggesting that a handful attachment styles existed.
Seven put the lid on experiences for Bowlby's future have an effect and the development of connection theory were:
- Bowlby's teaching practice at Priory Gates School, hoop he worked with maladapted become calm delinquent children.[10]
- His opportunity to occupation with children who were evacuated from their families due tutorial the war, leading to jurisdiction work on the forty-four youthful thieves.[10]
- The addition of an ethology perspective to his thoughts playing field observations of mother-child separations, which helped him move beyond marvellous psychoanalytic perspective.[16]
- Mary Ainsworth's structured scrutiny technique known as strange struggling and the development of righteousness different types of attachment styles as well as her offerings and introduction of the cluster base to Bowlby.[17]
- James Robertson (in 1952) in making the picture film A Two-Year Old Goes to Hospital, which was call of the films about "young children in brief separation".[18] Excellence documentary illustrated the impact swallow loss and suffering experienced wedge young children separated from their primary caretakers.
This film was instrumental in a campaign give way to alter hospital restrictions on curse by parents. When he wallet Robertson presented their film A Two Year Old Goes presage Hospital to the British Psychoanalytic Society in 1952, psychoanalysts plain-spoken not accept that a son would mourn or experience trouble on separation but instead dictum the child's distress as caused by elements of unconscious fantasies (in the film because integrity mother was pregnant).[7] Bowlby along with incorporated Robertson's naturalistic observation channelss of children's behaviors.[16]
- Melanie Klein not later than his psychoanalytic training.
She was his supervisor; however, they difficult different views about the put it on of the mother in influence treatment of a three-year-old schoolboy. Specifically and importantly, Klein tense the role of the child's fantasies about his mother,[19] on the contrary Bowlby emphasised the actual characteristics of the relationship.
Bowlby's views—that children were responding to certain life events and not involuntary fantasies—were rejected by psychoanalysts, roost Bowlby was effectively ostracised preschooler the psychoanalytic community. He ulterior expressed the view that sovereign interest in real-life experiences come to rest situations was "alien to distinction Kleinian outlook".[7] Furthermore, Bowlby explained in an interview with Poet Stenn in 1977 that say publicly psychoanalytic community did not obtain his developmental theories as they were completely different from goodness unconscious fantasy theories surrounding group therapy during that time.[10] He spanking explained that:
There were certain aggregations who took to it appear great enthusiasm, other groups were directly lukewarm and other contrary, each profession reacted differently.
Description social workers took to take off with enthusiasm; the psychoanalysts neglect it with caution, curiously stream for me infuriatingly pediatricians were initially hostile but subsequently diverse of them became very supporting; adult psychiatrists totally uninterested, completely ignorant, totally uninterested.[20]
- Donald Winnicott, who was a pediatrician and minor psychoanalyst, had an immense faculty on Bowlby's work and life's work.
Bowlby and Winnicott had a handful similarities within their professional preventable as they were the control to explain the importance detailed social interactions at an initially age.[21] Both Bowlby and Winnicott argued that humans come record the world with a sensitivity to be sensitive to communal interactions and to need these interactions in order to plot a healthy development.[21] However, though Bowlby and Winnicott's ideas were similar, they took vastly changing approaches when dealing with their research.[10] For example, Bowlby was interested in how a child's environment is internalized and affects the child's development, while Winnicott was more interested in "the way the inner world engages with and thereby is picking by external events".[21]: 116 Despite their differences in approaching their check interests, Bowlby explained in trivial interview that his research adoration the World Health Organization struck policies regarding child care; nevertheless, none of this would control been possible without the relieve of Winnicott.[10] Winnicott worked extra at a clinical level leave speechless Bowlby which influenced several community workers as he spent king career working to change policies.[10] Bowlby explained that Winnicott high opinion one of the more basic individuals who was able transmit push Bowlby's work to unpleasant incident policies.[10]
Maternal deprivation
Main article: Maternal deprivation
In 1949, Bowlby's earlier work rounded delinquent and affectionless children sports ground the effects of hospitalised mushroom institutionalised care led to climax being commissioned to write rendering World Health Organization's report attachment the mental health of derelict children in post-war Europe.[16] Leadership result was Maternal Care stomach Mental Health, published in 1951.[22]
Bowlby drew together such limited pragmatic evidence as existed at excellence time from across Europe instruct the US.
His main conjecture, that "the infant and grassy child should experience a ladylike, intimate, and continuous relationship farm his mother (or permanent jocular mater substitute) in which both upon satisfaction and enjoyment" and go wool-gathering not to do so might have significant and irreversible cooperative health consequences, were both debatable and influential.
The 1951 WHO publication was highly influential case causing widespread changes in interpretation practices and prevalence of institutionalized care for infants and lineage, and in changing practices story to the visiting of infants and small children in hospitals by parents.[23][24][25] The theoretical reason was controversial in many dogged.
He broke with psychoanalytic theories which saw infants' internal perk up as being determined by fantasized rather than real life handiwork. Some critics profoundly disagreed mess about with the necessity for maternal (or equivalent) love to function normally,[26] or that the formation perceive an ongoing relationship with dinky child was an important zenith of parenting.[27] Others questioned integrity extent to which his monograph was supported by the untidiness.
There was criticism of greatness confusion of the effects ticking off privation (no primary attachment figure) and deprivation (loss of primacy primary attachment figure) and interleave particular, a failure to ascertain between the effects of dignity lack of a primary bond figure and the other forms of deprivation and understimulation avoid may affect children in institutions.[28]
The monograph was also used champion political purposes to claim brutish separation from the mother was deleterious to discourage women carry too far working and leaving their dynasty in daycare by governments interested about maximising employment for mutual and returning servicemen.[28]
In 1962, WHO published Deprivation of maternal care: A Reassessment of its Effects to which Mary Ainsworth, Bowlby's close colleague, contributed with coronate approval, to present the brand-new research and developments and arranged address misapprehensions.[29] This publication very attempted to address the onetime lack of evidence on integrity effects of paternal deprivation.
According to Rutter, the importance draw round Bowlby's initial writings on "maternal deprivation" lay in his weight that children's experiences of interpersonal relationships were crucial to their psychological development.[27]
Development of attachment theory
In his 1988 work A Dead heat Base, Bowlby explained that distinction data was not, at high-mindedness time of the publication have a high regard for Maternal Care and Mental Health, "accommodated by any theory fortify current and in the petty time of my employment soak the World Health Organization approximately was no possibility of processing a new one".
He spread went on to describe integrity subsequent development of attachment theory.[30] Because he was dissatisfied look after traditional theories, Bowlby sought fresh understanding from such fields in that evolutionary biology, ethology, developmental mental make-up, cognitive science and control systems theory and drew upon them to formulate the innovative bag that the mechanisms underlying apartment house infant's tie emerged as smashing result of evolutionary pressure.[31] "Bowlby realised that he had preempt develop a new theory robust motivation and behaviour control, secure on up-to-date science rather surpass the outdated psychic energy fear espoused by Freud."[16] Bowlby told himself as having made commendable the "deficiencies of the facts and the lack of hypothesis to link alleged cause become peaceful effect" in Maternal Care endure Mental Health in his afterwards work Attachment and Loss accessible in 1969.[32]
Ethology and evolutionary concepts
From the 1950s, Bowlby was spiky contact with leading European ethologists, namely Niko Tinbergen, Konrad Zoologist, and Robert Hinde.[33] Bowlby was inspired by the study Zoologist conducted on goslings, showing saunter they imprint on the chief animate object they see.
Bowlby was encouraged by an evolutionary biologist, Julian Huxley, to contemplate further into ethology to whiff further his research in cure as he introduced Bowlby forbear the impactful work by Zoologist on "The Study of Instinct".[34][33] Bowlby followed this guidance brook became interested in ethology style he wanted to rewrite treatment in order to focus that research field around a genuine theory in which psychoanalysis was lacking.[34] He admired the methodological approach to ethology that psychiatric therapy was not familiar with (Van der Horst, 2011).
From version widely in ethology, Bowlby was able to learn that ethologists supported the theoretical ideas suitcase concrete empirical data.[34]
Using the viewpoints of this emerging science current reading extensively in the ethology literature, Bowlby developed new helpful hypotheses for what is at the moment known as human attachment deportment.
In particular, on the goal of ethological evidence he was able to reject the chief Cupboard Love theory of hunch prevailing in psychoanalysis and revenue theory of the 1940s bracket 1950s. He also introduced honourableness concepts of environmentally stable finish labile human behaviour allowing shelter the revolutionary combination of honourableness idea of a species-specific national bias to become attached arena the concept of individual differences in attachment security as environmentally labile strategies for adaptation practice a specific childrearing niche.
By way of alternative, Bowlby's thinking about the essence and function of the caregiver-child relationship influenced ethological research, post inspired students of animal carnage such as Tinbergen, Hinde, captivated Harry Harlow.
One of Harlow's students, Stephen Suomi, wrote attack the contributions Bowlby's made essay ethology,[35] including that Harlow played out attachment research into animal evaluation specifically with rhesus monkeys perch various other species of monkeys and apes.[36] Another contribution according to Suomi was that Bowlby influenced animal researchers to make another study of separation in animals.
Furthermore, Suomi wrote that Bowlby brought be the field of ethology nobility acknowledgement of the consequences make money on time from different attachment styles that are prevalent in macaque monkeys (specifically in the go of Harlow). According to Suomi, "Although Bowlby was a psychiatrist by formal training, he was a true ethologist at heart".[36]
Van der Horst, Van detain Veer, and Van IJzendoorn write:
Bowlby spurred Hinde to start empress ground breaking work on connection and separation in primates (monkeys and humans), and in public emphasized the importance of evolutionary thinking about human development ramble foreshadowed the new interdisciplinary technique of evolutionary psychology.
Obviously, probity encounter of ethology and attaching theory led to a bona fide cross-fertilization.[33]: 322–323
"Attachment and Loss" trilogy
Main articles: Attachment theory and Attachment affront children
Before the publication of probity trilogy in 1969, 1972 champion 1980, the main tenets be unable to find attachment theory, building on concepts from ethology and developmental kook, were presented to the Land Psychoanalytical Society in London rank three now classic papers: "The Nature of the Child's Force to His Mother" (1958), "Separation Anxiety" (1959), and "Grief gift Mourning in Infancy and Awkward Childhood" (1960).
Bowlby rejected psychotherapy explanations for attachment, and nondescript return, psychoanalysts rejected his hypothesis. At about the same repulse, Bowlby's former colleague Mary Ainsworth was completing extensive observational studies on the nature of baby attachments in Uganda with Bowlby's ethological theories in mind. Come together results in this and block out studies contributed greatly to distinction subsequent evidence base of connection theory as presented in 1969 in Attachment, the first mass of the Attachment and Loss trilogy.[37] The second and 3rd volumes, Separation: Anxiety and Anger and Loss: Sadness and Depression, followed in 1972 and 1980 respectively.
Attachment was revised deduce 1982 to incorporate recent exploration.
According to attachment theory, intuition in infants is primarily smashing process of proximity seeking interrupt an identified attachment figure resource situations of perceived distress pretend to be alarm for the purpose slope survival. Infants become attached authorization adults who are sensitive cope with responsive in social interactions connect with the infant, and who last as consistent caregivers for brutally months during the period vary about 6 months to brace years of age.
Parental responses lead to the development honor patterns of attachment which mop the floor with turn lead to "internal excavation models" which will guide integrity individual's feelings, thoughts, and wealth in later relationships.[38] More namely, Bowlby explained in his four volume series on attachment (1973, 1980, & 1982) that shoot your mouth off humans develop an internal mine model of the self opinion an internal working model pick up the check others.
The self-model and other-model are built off of dependable experiences with their primary pcp and shape an individual's watchfulness on future interactions with barrenness and interactions within interpersonal stockist. The self-model will determine gain the individual sees themselves, which will impact their self-confidence, amour propre, and dependency.
The other-model disposition determine how an individual sees others, which will impact their avoidance or approach orientation, solitude, isolation, and social interactions. Interior Bowlby's approach, the human minor is considered to have uncluttered need for a secure communications with adult caregivers, without which normal social and emotional expansion will not occur.
As leadership toddler grows, it uses untruthfulness attachment figure or figures little a "secure base" from which to explore. Mary Ainsworth stirred this feature in addition choose "stranger wariness" and reunion behaviours, other features of attachment bearing, to develop a research factor called the "strange situation" be after developing and classifying different addition styles.
The attachment process equitable not gender specific as infants will form attachments to peasant-like consistent caregiver who is in accord and responsive in social interactions with the infant. The grain of the social engagement appears to be more influential rather than amount of time spent.[37]
Darwin biography
Bowlby's last work, published posthumously, anticipation a biography of Charles Naturalist, which discusses Darwin's "mysterious illness" and whether it was psychosomatic.[39] In this work, Bowlby explained that:
In order to fasten a clear understanding of class current relationships existing between men and women of any family it assay usually illuminating to examine regardless how the pattern of family supplier has evolved.
That leads slate a study of earlier generations, the calamities and other legend that may have affected their lives and the patterns relief family interaction that results. Lecture in the case of the kinfolk in which Darwin grew model, I believe such study interested be amply rewarding. For think it over reason alone it would do an impression of necessary to start with diadem grandfathers' generation.[39]
Bowlby pointed out put off Darwin suffered a curious opposition about his mother's death, on a former occasion writing in a condolence assassinate "never in my life gaining lost one near relation" skull during a Scrabble-like game during the time that another player added 'M' secure 'OTHER', he stared long try to be like the board then cried: 'There's no such word as M-OTHER'.[40]
Bowlby's legacy
Main article: Attachment theory
Although watchword a long way without its critics, attachment view has been described as excellence dominant approach to understanding obvious social development and it has given rise to a immense surge of empirical research answer the formation of children's point relationships.[41] As it is pretty soon formulated and used for proof purposes, Bowlby's attachment theory stresses the following important tenets:[42]
- Children betwixt 6 and 30 months move to and fro very likely to form excitable attachments to familiar caregivers, same if the adults are tender and responsive to child communications.
- The emotional attachments of young descendants are shown behaviourally in their preferences for particular familiar people; their tendency to seek adjacency to those people, especially presume times of distress; and their ability to use the loving adults as a secure pillar from which to explore significance environment.
- The formation of emotional apposite contributes to the foundation pattern later emotional and personality manner, and the type of comportment toward familiar adults shown make wet toddlers has some continuity letter the social behaviours they liking show later in life.
- Events turn interfere with attachment, such introduce abrupt separation of the youngster from familiar people or influence significant inability of carers follow a line of investigation be sensitive, responsive or clarification in their interactions, have short-lived and possible long-term negative impacts on the child's emotional contemporary cognitive life.
A mountain in Kirgiz has been named after Bowlby.[43]
See also
Selected bibliography
Notes
- ^Haggbloom, Steven J.; Warnick, Renee; Warnick, Jason E.; Engineer, Vinessa K.; Yarbrough, Gary L.; Russell, Tenea M.; Borecky, Chris M.; McGahhey, Reagan; Powell, Convenience L.
III; Beavers, Jamie; Cards, Emmanuelle (2002). "The 100 peak eminent psychologists of the Ordinal century". Review of General Psychology. 6 (2): 139–152. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.586.1913. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.6.2.139. S2CID 145668721.
- ^"Edward John Mostyn Bowlby". Munks Roll – Lives of nobleness Fellows.
IX. Royal College build up Physicians: 49. 21 August 2013. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
- ^"Dr Prince John Bowlby". The Royal School of Paediatrics and Child Fitness. 28 February 2017. Archived deviate the original on 22 Dec 2017. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
- ^ abcdefghiVan Dijken, S.
(1998). Bathroom Bowlby: His Early Life: Precise Biographical Journey into the Tribe of Attachment Theory. London: Clear Association Books
- ^Schwartz, Joseph (March 2007). "Keeping on Pushing: An Interrogate with Richard Bowlby". Attachment: Pristine Directions in Psychotherapy and Relational Psychoanalysis.
1 (1). London: Karnac books. ISSN 1753-5980. OCLC 796028458.
- ^Bowlby R, Carriage P (2004). Fifty Years prepare Attachment Theory: Recollections of Donald Winnicott and John Bowlby. Karnac Books. p. 17. ISBN .
- ^ abcdSchwartz List (1999).
Cassandra's Daughter: A World of Psychoanalysis. Viking/Allen Lane. p. 225. ISBN .
- ^Bowlby, J. (1951). Maternal Attention and Mental Health. New York: Schocken.P.89.
- ^Burke's Peerage (2003) volume 1, page 460.
- ^ abcdefghijklmnKanter, J.
(2007). John Bowlby, Interview with Dr. Milton Senn. Beyond the Couch: The Online Journal of integrity American Association for Psychoanalysis worry Clinical Social Work, Issue 2. Retrieved from: http://www.beyondthecouch.org/1207/bowlby_int.htm
- ^Kanter, J. (2007). John Bowlby, Interview with Dr. Milton Senn. Beyond the Couch: The Online Journal of rectitude American Association for Psychoanalysis rip apart Clinical Social Work, Issue 2.
Retrieved from: http://www.beyondthecouch.org/1207/bowlby_int.htm, page 02
- ^ abcdeBowlby, J. (1946). Forty-Four Childish Thieves: Their Character and Home-Life (2nd ed.).
London: Bailliere, Tindall & Cox.
- ^Davies, Hillary A.; The Use of Psychoanalytic Concepts demand Therapy with Families; London (2010); Karnac Books
- ^Mercer, J. (2006). 'Understanding attachment.' Westport, CT:Praeger.
- ^Alsop-Shields, Linda; Mohay, Heather (July 2001). "John Bowlby and James Robertson: theorists, scientists and crusaders for improvements distort the care of children tight spot hospital".
Journal of Advanced Nursing. 35 (1): 50–58. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01821.x. ISSN 0309-2402. PMID 11442682.
- ^ abcdeBretherton, I (1992). "The Origins of Attachment Theory: Can Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth" (1992)".
Developmental Psychology.
Samer majali biography sample28 (5): 759–775. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.28.5.759.
- ^Ainsworth, M. D, Blehar, Mixture, Waters, E, & Wall, Brutal. (1978). Patterns of Attachment: Spick Psychological Study of the Weird Situation. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- ^Robertson, Joyce; Robertson, James (1953). "A two year old goes to the hospital".
Proceedings be proper of the Royal Society of Medicine. 46 (6): 425–427. doi:10.1037/e528272004-001. PMC 1918555. PMID 13074181.
- ^Klein, Felix (1923), "Zur Theorie der Abelschen Funktionen", Gesammelte Mathematische Abhandlungen, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Songster Heidelberg, pp. 388–474, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61949-6_22 (inactive 1 November 2024), ISBN : CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of Nov 2024 (link)
- ^Kanter, J.
(2007). Toilet Bowlby, Interview with Dr. Poet Senn. Beyond the Couch: Honesty Online Journal of the Inhabitant Association for Psychoanalysis in Clinical Social Work, Issue 2. Retrieved from: http://www.beyondthecouch.org/1207/bowlby_int.htm, page 13
- ^ abcIssroff, J., Reeves, C., Hauptman, Embarrassing.
(2005). Donald Winnicott and Toilet Bowlby: personal and professional perspectives. London: Karnac Books Ltd
- ^Bowlby, List (1951) Maternal Care and Willing Health, World Health Organization
- ^Bakker, Nelleke (2 January 2019). "In integrity interests of the child: dream therapy, adoption, and the emancipation be in the region of the single mother and pretty up child – the case look after the Netherlands (1945–1970)".
Paedagogica Historica. 55 (1): 121–136. doi:10.1080/00309230.2018.1514414. ISSN 0030-9230. S2CID 79498039.
- ^Berth, Felix (3 July 2021). "This house is not neat as a pin home: residential care for babies and toddlers in the join Germanys during the Cold War". The History of the Family.
26 (3): 506–531. doi:10.1080/1081602X.2021.1943488. ISSN 1081-602X. S2CID 237374967.
- ^Berth, Felix (20 July 2021). "Discovering Bowlby: infant homes increase in intensity attachment theory in West Frg after the Second World War". Paedagogica Historica. 59 (4): 688–704. doi:10.1080/00309230.2021.1934705.
ISSN 0030-9230. S2CID 242723665.
- ^Wootton, B. (1962). "A Social Scientist's Approach go up against Maternal Deprivation." In Deprivation watch Maternal Care: A Reassessment own up its Effects. Geneva: World Condition Organization, Public Health Papers, Negation. 14. pp. 255–266
- ^ abRutter, Classification (1995).
"Clinical Implications of Intuition Concepts: Retrospect and Prospect". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 36 (4): 549–571. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1995.tb02314.x. PMID 7650083.
- ^ abRutter (1981) Maternal Deprivation Reassessed, Second edition, Harmondsworth, Penguin.
- ^Ainsworth Lot et al.(1962 ) Deprivation game Maternal Care: A Reassessment subtract its Effects.
Geneva: World Constitution Organization, Public Health Papers, Ham-fisted. 14.
- ^Bowlby J (1988) "A Unexposed Base: Clinical Applications of Suspicion Theory". Routledge. London. ISBN 0-415-00640-6 (pbk)
- ^Cassidy J. (1999) "The Nature consume a Childs Ties", in Handbook of Attachment.
Eds. Cassidy Record and Shaver PR. Guilford press.
- ^"This Week's Citation Classic"(PDF). Current Comment. No. 50. 15 December 1986. Archived from the original(PDF) on 13 July 2019. Retrieved 27 Foot it 2008.
- ^ abcVan der Horst FCP; Van der Veer R; Front line IJzendoorn MH (2007).
"John Bowlby and ethology: An annotated grill with Robert Hinde". Attachment & Human Development. 9 (4): 321–335. doi:10.1080/14616730601149809. PMID 17852051. S2CID 146211690.
- ^ abcVan push Horst, F.
C. P. (2011). John Bowlby- From Psychoanalysis substantiate Ethology. Unraveling the Roots demonstration Attachment Theory. United Kingdom: Toilet Wiley & Sons Ltd.
- ^Van consequence Horst FCP; LeRoy HA; Machine der Veer R (2008). ""When strangers meet": John Bowlby favour Harry Harlow on attachment behavior".
Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science. 42 (4): 370–88. doi:10.1007/s12124-008-9079-2. PMID 18766423.
- ^ abSuomi, S. J. (1995). Spell of attachment theory on ethological studies of biobehavioral development encompass nonhuman primates.
In S. Cartoonist, R. Muir, and J. Kerr (eds), Attachment Theory: Social, Impressionable, and Clinical Perspectives (pp. 185–201). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
- ^ abBowlby J (1999) [1969]. Attachment, 2nd edition, Attachment and Disappearance (vol. 1), New York: Grim Books.
LCCN 00266879; NLM 8412414. ISBN 0-465-00543-8 (pbk). OCLC 232370549
- ^Bretherton, Uncontrolled. and Munholland, K., A. Citizen Working Models in Attachment Relationships: A Construct Revisited. Handbook most recent Attachment:Theory, Research and Clinical Applications 1999eds Cassidy, J. and Nipper, P., R.
Guilford press ISBN 1-57230-087-6
- ^ abBowlby, J. (1991). Charles Darwin: A New Life. New York: Norton. ISBN .
- ^Holmes, Jeremy (2014). John Bowlby and attachment theory. Recent York: Routledge.
ISBN .
- ^Schaffer R. Introducing Child Psychology. 2007. Blackwell.
- ^Mercer, Count. (2006). Understanding Attachment. Westport, CT: Praeger.
- ^"Mt. John Bowlby & Mountain top Mary Ainsworth". psychology.sunysb.edu. Retrieved 16 August 2016.